我的assignment``````

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/05/16 13:51:51
An advertisement appeared in the Miami Herald stating that the Pic-6 jackpot for a particular dog race on a certain date would be $825.000.Jackson attended the race on the date in question, made a bet, picked the winner, and won the jackpot.The track owner however paid Jackson only$25.000, claimingt that there was a printing error in the ad that the Miami Herald knew about before the race but failed tocorrect. Jackson sued for the balance of the money($800.000), claiming that the ad amounted to an offer and that he had accepted the offer by purchasing a ticking the winner. The track owner contended, first, that the ad was not an offer but an invitation to bargain and second, that it was an offer, he never intended the jackpot to be $825.000.Is Jackson entitled to the balance of the money?(Jackson v. Investment Corp. of Palm Beach,585 So.2d 949).
Analyze the above case in detail referring to the elements of a contract.

广告看来于迈阿密使者阐明， Pic-6困境为特殊狗种族在某一日期是出席种族在考虑中的日期，做赌注，被采摘优胜者和被赢取困境的$825.000.Jackson。然而轨道所有者支付了杰克逊only$25.000， claimingt有一个打印的错误在迈阿密使者在种族，但出故障的tocorrect之前知道的广告。 杰克逊为金钱起诉了($800.000)的平衡，声称广告共计提议，并且他通过购买滴答作响接受了提议优胜者。 轨道所有者角逐了，第一，广告是没有提议，而是邀请讲价和其次，它是提议，他未曾意欲困境是$825.000.Is杰克逊有资格获得金钱的平衡？(杰克逊v。 investment Corp。 Palm Beach， 585 So.2d 949)。 Analyze the above case in detail referring to the elements of a contract.